Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)

The influence of conditions on water holding capacity characteristics of triticale varieties planted in the Samarkand region

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3287
Submitted
15 January 2024
Published
21-10-2024 — Updated on 23-10-2024
Versions

Abstract

In this article, the possibilities of water holding capacity in the leaves of triticale varieties were studied in the conditions of LFMC-70% and arid LFMC-50% of grassland-gray soils of Samarkand region, and the drought resistance characteristics of the varieties were studied. LFMC (Limited Field Moisture Capacity) was maintained at 70% under normal conditions and LFMC at 50% under dry conditions. According to the results of the experimental analysis, drought conditions had a significant and negative effect on the productivity of all studied genotypes. It was found that triticale cultivars "Odessiy" and "Tikhon" grown under LFMC-50% conditions in drought conditions meet water deficit less in all development phases and at all times of the day and are drought resistant compared to other cultivars. Analysis of the physiological and biochemical bases of adaptation in the selection of drought-resistant triticale varieties and the research conducted on the selection and obtaining of fertile varieties suitable for this region are described.

References

  1. Munjonji L, Kwabena K. Ayisi leaf gas exchange and ?13C in cowpea and triticale under water stress and well-watered conditions. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):07060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07060
  2. Tamagno S, Pittelkow M, Fohner G, Nelsen S, Hegarty M, Carter E, et al. Optimizing water and nitrogen productivity of wheat and triticale across diverse production environments to improve the sustainability of baked products. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:952303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.952303
  3. Fowler D, Coyle M, Skiba U, Sutton A, Cape N, Reis S. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century, philosophical transactions of the royal society. 2013;368:20130164. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164
  4. Birou A, Muste S, Man S, Muresan V, Chircu C, Kadar R. Optimizing the wheat/triticale ratio to improve the quality parameters of bakery products. Bulletin UASVM Agriculture. 2010;67(2):10-29. https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:5054
  5. Lawson T, Blatt M. Stomatal size, speed and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(4):1556-70. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.237107
  6. Lonbani M, Arzani A. Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal drought stress tolerance in triticale and wheat. Agronomy Research. 2011;315-29.
  7. Dobreva S. Triticale past and future. Agricultural Science and Technology. 2016;4:271-75. DOI:10.15547/ast.2016.04.051
  8. Oetter G. The fortune of a botanical curiosity – Triticale: past, present and future. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2005;143:329-46. DOI:10.1017/S0021859605005290
  9. Blum A. The abiotic stress response and adaptation of triticale: A review. Cereal Res. Commun. 2014;42:359-75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24689411
  10. Gutteridge J, Hornby D, Hollins W, Prew D. Take-all in autumn-sown wheat, barley, triticale and rye grown with high and low inputs. Plant Pathology. 1993;42(3):425-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1993.tb01521
  11. Cantale C, Petrazzuolo F, Correnti A, Farneti A, Felici F, Latini A, Galeffi P. Triticale for bioenergy production. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2016;8:609-16. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
  12. Mergoum M, Gómez-Macpherson H. Triticale improvement and production. FAO. 2010;5:11-25. https://www.fao.org/3/y5553e/y5553e
  13. Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Science Direct. 1993;33:399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90161-F
  14. Motzo R, Pruneddu G, Giunta F. The role of stomatal conductance for water and radiation use efficiency of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Eur J Agron. 2013;44:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.09.002
  15. Mazurov N, Sanova S, Dzhumaeva E, Eremeev I. Guidelines for the use of winter triticale in feeding highly productive dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;29:1-13.
  16. Fedorov K. Triticale is a valuable grain crop. Feed Production. 1997;5:41-43.
  17. Dassanayake M, Kumar A. Techno-economic assessment of triticale straw for power generation. Applied Energy. 2012;98:236-45. doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.030
  18. Shabolkina N, Goryanina A. Selection of winter triticale for baking. News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara. 2014;5(3):1181-83.
  19. Zhu F. Triticale, nutritional composition and food uses. Food Chem. 2018;15(4):468-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.009
  20. Hura T, Grzesiak S. Physiological and biochemical tools useful in drought-tolerance detection in genotypes of winter triticale, accumulation of ferulic acid correlates with drought tolerance. Annals of Botany. 2007;100:767-75. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm162
  21. Yang D. Morphological and physiological traits of triticale as affected by drought stress. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023;83(2):0718-5839. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392023000200203
  22. Hooker JD. Oberonia falconeri Hook. f. Hooker's Icones Plantarum; or figures, with brief descriptive characters and remarks of new or rare plants. London. 1888;18: t. 1780.
  23. Gupta PK, Priyadarshan PM. Tritikale: hozirgi holat va kelajak istiqbollari. 1982;21:255-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60300-4
  24. Tursunov A, Urokov S. Effect of microelements (B, Zn) on cotton plant’s productivity, its leaf area and plant height. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2023;14:955-67. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2023.148064
  25. Valiyev Sh, Rajabov T, Avutkhonov B, Ataeva Sh. Changes of photosynthetic pigments of Artemisia diffusa under the influence of grazing stress of livestock grazing in Karnabchul semi-desert, Uzbekistan. Plant Science Today. 2023;10:417-21. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2430
  26. Dospexov ?. Methodology of field experience. Agropromizdat. 1985;347p.
  27. Stoyanov H. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of triticale in the conditions of South Dobrudzha, Series A. Agronomy. 2021;21:ISSN 2285-5785.
  28. Kutlu I, Kinaci G. Evaluation of drought resistance indices for yield and its components in three triticale cultivars. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 2010;7(2):95-103.
  29. Alagoz SH. Morpho physiological responses and growth indices of triticale to drought and salt stresses. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:8896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36119-y
  30. Nadeau E. Effects of plant species, stage of maturity and additive on the feeding value of whole-crop cereal silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2007;87:789-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2773
  31. Ramazani SH. Evaluation of drought tolerance of triticale (xTriticosecale Wittm. ex A.Camus) genotypes along with bread wheat and barley genotypes. Actaagriculturae Slovenica. 2019;113(2):337-48. doi:10.14720/aas.2019.113.2.15
  32. Derycke1 V. Straw yield and quality: An extra motivation for the introduction of triticale in mixed farming systems. Cereal Research Communications. 2018;46(1):158-68. DOI: 10.1556/0806.45.2017.062

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.