Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Morphological and SSR marker analysis for genetic diversity assessment in galgal (Citrus pseudolimon Tanaka) germplasm

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7050
Submitted
3 January 2025
Published
31-03-2025 — Updated on 13-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Galgal (hill lemon or Himalayan lemon), an indigenous and drought-tolerant species widely grown across Himalayan states, is renowned for its culinary use in pickles and beverages. Despite its utility, galgal remains underutilized, necessitating comprehensive studies on its genetic and phenotypic diversity. This study investigated the genetic diversity of 13 Indigenous galgal germplasm maintained at the ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, using 21 morphological traits and 46 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The study demonstrated the ability to select germplasm for breeding by the highest phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation for traits like seed number (61.35 % and 60.57 %), canopy volume (53.33 % and 53.29 %) and rind thickness (45.92 % and 45.49 %). High heritability (>80 %) and genetic advance for characters like canopy volume, fruit weight and rind thickness suggest the predominance of additive gene action, making them ideal targets for improvement. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified seven components explaining 92.3 % of the variability, with fruit and plant traits contributing the most. Cluster analysis grouped the germplasm into three clusters based on morphological characteristics. Molecular characterization using 46 SSR markers showed distinct germplasm with polymorphism information content (PIC) values ranging from 0.260 to 0.698, averaging 0.4851. UPGMA dendrogram and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) clustered the germplasm into two major groups. The results of the morphological and molecular markers revealed a rich genetic diversity of galgal. The germplasm present in the single cluster should be avoided in breeding. The traits responsible for genetic variation in galgal germplasm should be considered for galgal improvement programmes.

References

  1. Rajput CBS, Haribabu R. Citriculture. New Delhi: Kalyani Publisher; 1993
  2. Mahajan RK, Lal BB. Evaluation studies on Himachal Galgal (Citrus pseudolimon Tan) for processing industry. J Food Sci Technol. 1991;28:378–80.
  3. Kumar R, Kumar V, Sharma J, Bakshi P, Singh VB, Raina V, Sinha. Galgal: A boon for pickle industry. Rashtriya Krishi. 2018;13(1):89–91.
  4. Sen T. Tanaka Galgal – Khatta. 2020. [cited 2024 November 1]. Available from: http://himalayanwildfoodplants.com/2020/12/citrus–pseudolimon–tanaka–galgal–khtta/.
  5. Attri BL, Maini SB. Processing galgal into nutritious delicacies. Ind Hortic. 1996;36:10–14.
  6. Thappa RK, Bindu K, Raina BL, Agarwal SG. Essential oil composition of fresh osmotically dehydrated galgal peels. J Food Sci Technol. 2000;37:30–32.
  7. Grover S, Aggarwal P, Kumar A, Kaur S, Yadav R, Khatkar SK, Regassa H. Assessment of morphological, phytochemical, antioxidant and nutritional profiles of underexplored Citrus pseudolimon (Galgal) using various analytical techniques. Waste Biomass Valori. 2024;15:5673–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12649–024–02531–2
  8. Parmar C, Kaushal MK. Wild fruits of the Sub–Himalayan region. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 1982
  9. Singh D, Rana JC, Kumar K, Rana VS. Exploring seasonal barrier breaking novel genes: ever–bearing hill lemon, Citrus pseudolimon Tanaka. Int J Farm Sci. 2016;6(2):108–11.
  10. Badiyala SD, Sharma SK. Variability studies in galgal (Citrus pseudolimon Tanaka) in upper Shivaliks of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Hortic. 2004;61(2):105–08.
  11. Sharma SK, Sharma PC, Lal BB. Storage studies of foam mat dried hill Lemon (Citrus pseudolimon Tan.) juice powder. J Food Sci Technol. 2004;41:9–13.
  12. Singh NP, Gill PS, Jawandha SK, Harminder K. Genetic variability in hill lemon strains (Citrus pseudolimon Tanaka) under Punjab Conditions. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2009;37(1):238–43. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3713128
  13. Matthew JO, Oziegbe M. Intraspecific and interspecific of four Ocimum species. Niger J Genet. 2016;30:8–12.
  14. Chungada AS, Gahukar SJ, Akhare AA, Behere GT, Solanke AU, Patil SR. Genetic diversity and DNA fingerprinting of different citrus species using scar markers. The Pharma Innov J. 2022;SP–11(10):1362–67.
  15. Susandarini R, Subandiyah S, Daryono BS, Rugayah R. Microsatellite polymorphism for molecular characterization of pomelo (Citrus maxima) accessions from Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2020;21(6):2390–95. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210608
  16. Ahmed S, Rattanpal HS, Singh G. Diversity, characterization and evaluation in Pummelo (Citrus maxima Merr.) cultivars using SSR markers and quality parameters. Ind J Genet. 2019;79(03):594–605. https://doi.org/10.31742/IJGPB.79.3.9
  17. Kaur H, Sidhu GS, Sarao NK, Singh R, Singh G. Assessment of genetic diversity of mandarin cultivars grown in major citrus regions of world using morphological and microsatellite markers. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2022;63(3):425–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580–021–00404–4
  18. Kumar JPT, Thirugnanavel A, Upadhyay DY, Kamde SA, Jalamkar PR, Murkute AA. Genetic diversity and population structure of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) germplasm revealed by SSR and InDel markers. Ind J Agric Sci. 2024;94(6):606–12. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i6.146914
  19. Tupke AH, Akhare AA, Gahukar SJ, Bahatkar BP, Zadokar AR, Gaikwad PN, Katkade RR. DNA fingerprinting: A novel technique for identification of important species of citrus. Ann Phytomed. 2021;10:202–07. http://dx.doi.org/10.21276/ap.2021.10.1.21
  20. Gaikwad AB, Archak S, Saxena S. Technology development for identification of citrus (Citrus spp) rootstocks based on sequence tagged microsatellite marker. Indian J Agric Sci. 2013;83(10):1110–12.
  21. Castle WS. Antitranspirant and root and canopy pruning effects on mechanically transplanted eight–year–old 'Murcott'citrus trees. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 1983;108(6):981–85. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.108.6.981
  22. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official method of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington, VA: USA; 2000
  23. Panse VG, Shukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers 2nd ed. ICAR, New Delhi; 1967. p.152–57
  24. Burton GW. Quantitative inheritance in pearl millet (P. typhoides L.). Agron J. 1952;50:503.
  25. Burton GW, Devane. Estimation of variability in tall fescue (Festula arundnaces) from replicated clonal material. Agron J. 1953;45:474–81. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
  26. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron J. 1955;47:314–18. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  27. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2012
  28. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024 [cited 2024 Sept 24]. Available from: https://www.R–project.org/>
  29. Perrier X, Jacquemoud–Collet JP. DARwin software [internet]; 2006 [cited 2024 Sept 24]. Available from: http://darwin.cirad.fr/
  30. Sahoo B, Panda A, Mohanty S, Senapati N. Gene-gene correlation, path coefficients and the genetic variability of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. J Crop Weed. 2022;18:171–84. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2022.v18.i2.1587
  31. Rajae YA, Najat HA, Mohamed IB, Tarik AD, Ennacir HA, Adnane HM, et al. Study of genetic variability, heritability and repeatability for fruit quality characters in Citrus sinensis. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2019;20(19–20):860–68.
  32. Maan SS, Brar JS, Mittal A, Gill MI, Arora NK, Sohi HS, et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL mapping of fruit quality traits in guava (Psidium guajava L.). Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1123274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1123274
  33. Angami T, Kalita H, Touthang L, Makdoh B, Bagra G, Singh R, et al. Varietal assessment and genetic variability studies of pummelo (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck) accessions under mid-hill conditions. Environ Ecol. 2022;40(3):1046–52.
  34. Rattanpal HS, Uppal GS, Gupta M, Gill BS. Assessing genetic diversity in rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush.) using morphological characters. J Environ Biol. 2022;43(5):651–59. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/43/5/mrn–3057
  35. Akhter M, Apon FN, Bhuiyan MMR, Siddique AB, Husna A, Zeba N. Genetic variability, correlation coefficient, path coefficient and principal component analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2021;22:46–59.
  36. Singh G, Rattanpal HS, Gupta M, Sidhu GS. Genetic variability and heritability among mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) genotypes under Indian sub–tropical conditions. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2022;20(4):2913–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2004_29132930
  37. Mahebub PA, Babu MR, Sasikala K. Studies on genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for growth, yield and quality traits. The Pharma Innov J. 2021;10:1741–43.
  38. Malik SK, Rohini MR, Kumar S, Choudhary R, Pal D, Chaudhury R. Assessment of genetic diversity in sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] cultivars of India using morphological and RAPD markers. Agric Res. 2012;1:317–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003–012–0045–3
  39. Marboh ES, Singh AK, Dubey AK, Prakash J. Analysis of genetic variability among citrus (Citrus spp) genotypes using morphological traits. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(2):203–11. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46499
  40. Xin YH, Wu YX, Qiao B, Su L, Xie SQ, Ling P. Evaluation on the phenotypic diversity of Calamansi (Citrus microcarpa) germplasm in Hainan island. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):371. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–021–03775–x
  41. Dubey AK, Sharma RM, Awasthi OP, Srivastav M, Sharma N. Genetic diversity in lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swing.) and lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm.) based on quantitative traits in India. Agrofor Syst. 2016;90:447–56. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10457–015–9867–x
  42. Huang Y, He J, Xu Y, Zheng W, Wang S, Chen P, et al. Pangenome analysis provides insight into the evolution of the orange subfamily and a key gene for citric acid accumulation in citrus fruits. Nat Genet. 2023;55(11):1964–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588–023–01516–6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.