Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

India's compliance with the international IPR regime – A case of plant genetic resources

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7324
Submitted
20 January 2025
Published
07-07-2025 — Updated on 14-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

The Indian subcontinent is one of the eight Primary Vavilonian Centers of crop origin and ranks second after the Chinese centre regarding crop origin. The region has 117 crop species, including rice, millet and legumes. India is also one of the 17 megadiverse countries of the world. Studies show that India has made an excellent contribution to Svalbard Global Seed Vault compared to any individual Gene Bank. Owing to its rich biodiversity, the country must enforce the best governance system for its Plant Genetic Resources (PGRs) for food and agriculture under the International Intellectual Property Regime. Though developed at a relatively slower pace than other IPRs, India's two key legislations - the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (PPV & FRA) and the Geographical Indications Act, 1999 (GIA), which offer legal protection to its PGRs. Complementing these legislations, the Biological Diversity Act (2002), amended in 2023), BDA ensures access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from their utilization. The Indian sui-generis legislation for plant variety protection has a unique component: Farmers' Rights. This article briefly reviews India's compliance with the international IPR regime, using PGRs as a case study.

References

  1. 1. Paroda RS, Arora RK, editors. Plant genetic resources conservation and management. Wageningen: International Board of Plant Genetic Resources; 1991.
  2. 2. Harlan JR. Agricultural origins: Centers and Noncenters. Science. 1971;174(4008):468–74. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4008.468
  3. 3. Vavilov NI. Theoretical basis for plant breeding, The phytogeographical basis for plant breeding. Love D, translator. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1935.
  4. 4. Hawkes JG. The diversity of crop plants [Internet]. Harvard University Press eBooks. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1983. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674183551
  5. 5. Khoshoo TN. Conservation of biological diversity. In: Plant genetic resources - Indian perspective. New Delhi: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources; 1988.
  6. 6. Rana RS. India takes the lead in the conservation of plant genetic resources. Indian Farm. 1993;43(7):37–44.
  7. 7. Nayar MP, Singh AK, Nair KN, editors. Agrobiodiversity hotspots in India: Conservation and benefit sharing. Volume I. New Delhi: Protection of plant varieties & farmers' rights authority, Department of Agriculture &
  8. Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, 2009.
  9. 8. Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, et al. Hotspots Revisited: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions, Mexico City: CEMEX, 2004.
  10. 9. Nayar MP. Changing patterns of the Indian flora. Bull Bot Surv India, 1977;19:145–54.https://doi.org/10.20324/nelumbo/v19/1977/75567
  11. 10. Nayar MP. Hot spots of endemic plants of India, Nepal and Bhutan. Thiruvananthapuram: Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, 1996.
  12. 11. Sehgal J, Mandal DK, Mandal C, Vadivelu S. Agro-Ecological Regions of India, 2nd ed, Tech. Bull. No. 24. Nagpur: National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning,1992.
  13. 12. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, India [Internet]. PGR Portal [updated 2024 Nov; cited 2024 Nov 30]. http://www.nbpgr.ernet.in/Research_Projects/Base_Collection_in_NGB.aspx
  14. 13. Jacob SR, Tyagi V, Agrawal A, Chakrabarty SK, Tyagi RK. Correction: Indian plant germplasm on the global platter: An analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126634. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132087
  15. 14. Parameswaran P, Kumar AN. Access and benefit sharing: Agro biodiversity and farmers' rights on seeds—The case of Indigenous Rice Varieties of Wayanad, Kerala, India. In: Oommen OV, Laladhas KP, Nelliyat P, Pisupati B. editors. Biodiversity conservation through access and benefit sharing (ABS). Springer, Cham; 2022; p. 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16186-5_9
  16. 15. Halewood M, Noriega IL, Selim L. The global crop commons and access and benefit-sharing laws, examining the limits of international policy support for the collective pooling and management of plant genetic resources, In: Halewood M, Noriega IL, Selim L, editors. Crop genetic resources as a global commons: challenges in International law and governance. Routledge; UK; 2013; p.1–36.
  17. 16. Byerlee D, Dubin HJ. Crop improvement in the CGIAR is a global success story of open access and international collaboration. Int J Commons. 2010; 4(1):452–80. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.147
  18. 17. Pistorius R. Scientists, plants and politics: a history of the plant genetic resources movement. Rome: International Plant Genetic Research Institute. Rome; 1997.
  19. 18. Alcázar JE, Hilmi A, Noriega IL. Brief history of the negotiations on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. In: Halewood M, Noriega IL, Selim L, editors. Crop genetic resources as a global commons: challenges in international law and governance. Routledge; UK; 2013; p. 135–49.
  20. 19. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food & Agriculture. ITPGRFA [Internet] Food and Agricultural Organization; 2001 Nov [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/en/
  21. 20. Joshi BK, Vernooy R, Chaudhary P. Crop interdependence, adaptation to climate change and the multilateral systems of access and benefit sharing: the case of Nepal. Indian J Plant Genet Resour. 2017;30(3):210. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2017.00026.2
  22. 21. World Intellectual Property Organization [Internet]. WIPO [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.wipo.
  23. int/about-ip/en/
  24. 22. Blakeney M. Agricultural research, and exchange of germplasm: legal aspects of sui generis and patent regimes. In: A Krattiger editor. Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: a handbook of best practices. MIHR Oxford; 2007; p. 401–08.
  25. 23. Gopalakrishnan NS. An "effective" sui generis law to protect plant varieties and farmers' rights in India: a critique. J World Intell Prop 20:4(1):157–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2001.tb00168.x
  26. 24. Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, India [Internet]. History of Indian patent system [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://ipindia.gov.in/history-of-indian-patent-system.htm
  27. 25. Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, India [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://ipindia.gov.in/acts-gi.htm
  28. 26. Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Authority, India [Internet]. PPV&FRA; 2001 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://plantauthority.gov.in/acts-rules
  29. 27. National Biodiversity Authority, India [Internet]. NBA; 2002 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://nbaindia.org/content/25/
  30. 19/1/act.html
  31. 28. World Trade Organization, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights [Internet]. TRIPS [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm
  32. 29. Fridtjof Nansen Institute, The Farmers' Rights Project [Internet]. FNI [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.farmers
  33. rights.org
  34. 30. Seed Association of India. Plant variety protection pros and cons, In: Proceedings of the Second National Seed Seminar; 1989 Mar 13- 14; New Delhi, Seed Association of India, 1990
  35. 31. Swaminathan MS. Agrobiodiversity and Farmers' Rights. In: Swaminathan MS, editor. Proceedings of a technical consultation on an implementation framework for farmers' rights; 1996 Jan 15–18; Madras. M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, Madras, 1996. p. 303.
  36. 32. Balaravi S. Manual on Farmers' Rights [Internet]. M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, MSSRF/MA/04/12 [cited 2024 Dec 1] https://59.160.153.188/library/sites/default/files/Manual%20on%20farmers%20rights.pdf
  37. 33. Protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights authority, India [Internet]. PPV&FRA [updated 2024 Dec; cited 2024 Dec 24]. https://plantauthority.gov.in/
  38. 34. The Convention on Biological Diversity [Internet] CBD. 2002 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.cbd.
  39. int/
  40. 35.National Biodiversity Authority, India [Internet] NBA [cited 2024 Dec 1]. http://nbaindia.org/content/684/62/1/applicationprocess.html
  41. 36. National Biodiversity Authority, India [Internet]. Annual Report (2020-2021). [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://nbaindia.
  42. org/uploaded/pdf/AR_English_2020-21.pdf
  43. 37. National law school of India University [Internet]. Examination of the biological diversity (Amendment) Bill, 2021 Submission of written memoranda/suggestions to the joint committee on the biological diversity (amendment) bill, 2021; 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://ceerapub.nls.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Biological-Diverity-Amendment-Bill-2021.pdf
  44. 38. Gupta TD. Amendments to Indian biodiversity laws could open doors to exploitation [Internet]. Science. 2023. [updated 2023 Aug 11; cited 2024 Dec 1. https://www.science.org/content/article/amendments-indian-biodiversity-laws-could-open-doors-exploitation
  45. 39. Egziabher BTG, Edwards S. The loss of crop genetic diversity in the changing world, In: Navdanya. Seed Freedom, a global citizens report [Internet]. Vandana Shiva, Ruchi Shroff, Caroline Lockhart (Co-ord.). 2012 [updated 2012 Oct; cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://navdanyainternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Seed-Freedom_Revised_8-10-
  46. 2012.pdf
  47. 40. Navdanya. Seed Freedom, a global citizens report [Internet]. Vandana Shiva, Ruchi Shroff, Caroline Lockhart (Co-ord.). 2012 [updated 2012 Oct; cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://navdanyainternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Seed-Freedom_Revised_8-10-2012.pdf
  48. 41. Bhutani S. Seed Sovereignty. Econ Polit Wkly. 2015;50(21):4.
  49. 42. Srinivasan CS. Exploring the feasibility of farmers' rights. Dev Policy Rev. 2003:21(4):419–47. https://doi.org/10.
  50. 1111/1467-7679.00218
  51. 43. Borowaik C. Farmers' rights: Intellectual property regimes and the struggle over seeds. Pol Soc. 2004:32(4):511–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979
  52. 44. Parameswaran P. Farmers' rights to seeds, issues in the Indian Law. Econ Polit Wkly. 2015;50(12):16–28.
  53. 45. Bhutani S. Pay up, or give up your IP! [Internet]. 2015 April 05 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://indiatogether.org/plant-variety-protection-law-and-seed-ip-costs-for-farmers-agriculture
  54. 46. Kochupillai M. The Indian PPV&FR Act, 2001: Historical and implementation perspectives. J Intellect Prop Rights. 2011;16(2):88–101.
  55. 47. Ramanna A. The farmer's rights project-Background study 4: Farmers' rights in India: A case study. FNI report 6/2006. Farmers' Rights Project, Fridtjof Nansen Institute; 2006. [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.fni.no/getfile.php/
  56. 131801-1469869136/Filer/Publikasjoner/FNI-R0606.pdf
  57. 48. Bhutani S. Copyrights for farmers: role of agricultural intermediaries, year FVs. Econ Polit Wkly. 2015;50(32):18.
  58. 49. Lushington K. The registration of plant varieties by farmers in India: A status report. Rev Agrar Studs. 2012;2(1):112–28.https://doi.org/10.25003/RAS.02.01.0005
  59. 50. Anuradha RV. Sharing with the kanis: A case study from Kerala, India [Internet]. Convention on Biological Diversity. [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.cbd.int/financial/bensharing/india-kanis.pdf
  60. 51. Parameswaran P. India lays the cornerstone of the biodiversity access and benefit sharing system. Curr Sci . 2017;112(1):24–28.
  61. 52. Bhutani S, Kohli K. Ten Years of the Biological Diversity Act. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(39):15–18.
  62. 53. United Nations Environment Programme. Shifting the needle on biodiversity conservation in India [Internet]. 2020 February 05 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/shifting-needle-biodiversity-conservation-india
  63. 54. Meenakumari B, Rana RS. Implementing the Biological Diversity Act in India: Focus on ABS and agro-biodiversity. Indian J Plant Genet Resour. 2017;30(1):25. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2017.00003.1
  64. 55. Pisupati B. Biodiversity governance: Lessons for international environment governance [Internet]. National Biodiversity Authority, India; 2013 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://nbaindia.org/uploaded/docs/BD_and_Governance.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.