Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Salinity tolerance screening of traditional mangoes: Analysis of physiological and biochemical traits for abiotic stress tolerance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11996
Submitted
26 September 2025
Published
11-11-2025

Abstract

The study investigates the salinity stress tolerance of 34 traditional mango accessions from South Kerala. Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting mango cultivation, especially in coastal and irrigated regions where salt accumulation in soil and water adversely affects growth, yield and fruit quality. Traditional mango varieties, being locally adapted and genetically diverse, may possess inherent tolerance mechanisms that enable survival under saline conditions. Screening these varieties for salinity tolerance through physiological and biochemical traits provides valuable insights for identifying tolerant genotypes. Key parameters such as chlorophyll content, relative water content, electrolyte leakage, proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activity serve as indicators of stress response and adaptive potential. Understanding these traits helps in assessing varietal differences in osmotic adjustment, ion regulation and oxidative stress management. The experiment observed significant increases in glycine betaine, proline and total soluble sugar levels under salinity stress, with accession KLM10 exhibiting the highest GB content. Enzymatic antioxidant varied significantly among accessions, with KLM12 displaying the highest catalase activity. The analysis of total chlorophyll content indicated that KLM10 maintained the highest chlorophyll levels under stress. The salinity tolerance index was highest in KLM10. A moderate positive correlation was found between total phenol content, chlorophyll content and TI, suggesting these parameters as potential markers for salinity tolerance. The study of traditional mangoes under salinity stress thus contributes to the selection and conservation of tolerant cultivars, facilitating sustainable mango production and genetic improvement programs aimed at enhancing abiotic stress tolerance.

References

  1. 1. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008;59(2):137-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  2. 2. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 2002;25(2):176-83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
  3. 3. Tester M, Davenport R. Na⁺ tolerance and Na⁺ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 2003;91(5):166-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg058
  4. 4. Singh A, Singh RK, Kumar P, Sing A. Mango biodiversity in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: Indigenous knowledge and traditional products. Indian J Traditional Know 2015;14(2):234-40.
  5. 5. Maas EV, Grattan SR. Crop yields as affected by salinity. Plant Soil 2015;166:224-32. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr38.c3
  6. 6. Nimbolkar PK, Kurian MR, Upreti KK, Laxman RH, Shivashankara KS, Varalakshmi LR. Physio-biochemical responses of polyembryonic mango (Mangifera indica L.) genotypes to varying levels of salinity stress. J Hortic Sci 2023;18(1):223-30. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v18i1.2158
  7. 7. Wicke B, Sikkema R, Dornburg V, Faaij A. Exploring land use changes and the role of palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia. Land Use Policy 2011;28(1):155-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.001
  8. 8. Zuazo VHD, Raya AM, Ruiz JA. Impact of salinity on the fruit yield of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Osteen’). Eur J Agron 2004;21(3):206-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.004
  9. 9. Degani C, El-Batsri R, Gazit S. Enzyme polymorphism in mango. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 2019;115-20. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.115.5.844
  10. 10. Galán Saúco V. Mango rootstock: A review. Acta Hortic 2019;18:244-53. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1244.1
  11. 11. Sofy MR, Elhawat N, Tarek A. Glycine betaine counters salinity stress by maintaining high K⁺/Na⁺ ratio and antioxidant defense via limiting Na⁺ uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2020;15:200-9. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1244.1
  12. 12. Zhu M, Li Q, Zhang Y, Hng M, Li Z. Glycine betaine increases salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) by regulating Na⁺ homeostasis. Front Plant Sci 2022;13:192-201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.978304
  13. 13. Fougère F, Rudulier DL, Streeter JG. Effects of salt stress on amino acid, organic acid and carbohydrate composition of roots, bacteroids and cytosol of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol 1991;20:122-32. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.96.4.1228
  14. 14. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci 1998;18:135-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
  15. 15. Tuna AL, Kaya C, Dikilitas M, Higgs D. Combined effects of gibberellic acid and salinity on some antioxidant enzyme activities, plant growth parameters and nutritional status in maize plants. Environ Exp Bot 2008;10:202-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.007
  16. 16. Michalak A. Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol J Environ Stud 2006;15(4):123-31.
  17. 17. Sharma P, Dubey RS. Drought induces oxidative stress and enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 2005;46(3):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-005-0002-2
  18. 18. De Azevedo Neto AD, Prisco JT, Enéas-Filho J, Abreu CE, Gomes-Filho E. Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 2006;56:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008
  19. 19. Luo MB, Liu F. Salinity-induced oxidative stress and regulation of antioxidant defense system in the marine macroalga Ulva prolifera. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2011;10:409-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.023
  20. 20. Parida AK, Jha B. Antioxidative defense potential to salinity in the euhalophyte Salicornia brachiata. J Plant Growth Regul 2010;29(2):207-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9129-0
  21. 21. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 2012;22:125-32. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/217037
  22. 22. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 2010;48:275-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
  23. 23. Parida AK, Das AB, Mohanty P. Defense potentials to NaCl in a mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora: Differential changes of isoforms of some antioxidative enzymes. J Plant Physiol 2004;161(5):178-85. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01084
  24. 24. El Sabagh A, Islam MS, Skalicky M, Ali Raza M, Singh K, Anwar HM, et al. Salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the changing climate: Adaptation and management strategies. Front Agron 2021;3(1):156-62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.661932
  25. 25. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci 1997;2(4):192-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01018-2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.