Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023)

Effect of Leather Tanning Effluent on Chromium Contamination in Paddy Fields

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2188
Submitted
14 October 2022
Published
19-03-2023 — Updated on 01-04-2023
Versions

Abstract

Leather tanning industry effluent contains high chromium (Cr) concentrations and poses environmental threats. In this study, we investigated the impact of leather tanning effluent contamination in water, soil, paddy, its grain and and its other morphometric parameters under the irrigated areas in the Ciwalen River, West Java. The result showed high Cr concentration in Ciwalen water stream, soil and paddy. The higher Cr concentrations of soil and paddy were found in the upstream area and closer plot to the main river stream. The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values were <1, indicating that paddy has a low ability to accumulate Cr. However, paddy morphometric parameters, including total length, root length, and the number of leaves, decreased with higher Cr concentrations affected by leather tanning effluents.

References

  1. Paul HL, Philips PS, Covington AD, Evans P, Antunes APM. Dechroming Optimisation of Chrome Tanned Leather Waste As Potential Poultry Feed Additives: Waste to Resources Approach. DER? B?L?M. 2013; 7(3): 10–19
  2. Suryawanshi PC, Jain KA, Bhardwaj S, Chaudhari AB, Yeole TY. Solid and liquid wastes: Avenues of collection and disposal. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences. 2013; 2(3):74–77.
  3. Wu C, Zhang W, Liao X, Zeng Y, Shi B. Transposition of chrome tanning in leather making. Journal of the American Leather Chemist Association. 2014;109(6):176–183.
  4. Homa D, Haile E, Washe AP. Determination of Spatial Chromium Contamination of the Environment around Industrial Zones. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7214932
  5. Mukherjee, Kakali, Rumpa Saha, Aniruddha Ghosh, and Bidyut Saha. Chromium removal technologies. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2013; 39:2267-2286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-012-0779-3
  6. Oruko RO, Selvarajan R, Ogola HJ, Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO. Contemporary and future direction of chromium tanning and management in sub Saharan Africa tanneries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2020; 133:369-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.013
  7. Sundar VJ, Raghavarao J, Muralidharan C, Mandal AB. Recovery and utilization of chromium-tanned proteinous wastes of leather making: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2011; 41(22): 2048–2075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2010.497434
  8. Hansen MB, Johansen JD, Menné T. Chromium allergy: Significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49(4):206–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0230.x
  9. China CR, Maguta MM, Nyandoro SS, Hilonga A, Kanth SV, Njau KN. Alternative tanning technologies and their suitability in curbing environmental pollution from the leather industry: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere. 2020; 254:126804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126804
  10. Shahid M, Shamshad S, Ra M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Khan N, et al. Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake , toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system?: A review. Chemosphere. 2017; 178:513–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074
  11. Ma J, Lv C, Xu M, Chen G, Lv C, Gao Z. Photosynthesis performance, antioxidant enzymes, and ultrastructural analyses of rice seedlings under chromium stress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016; 23:1768-1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5439-x
  12. Medda S, Mondal NK. Chromium toxicity and ultrastructural deformation of Cicer arietinum with special reference of root elongation and coleoptile growth. Annals of Agrarian Sciences. 2017; 15(3):396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2017.05.022
  13. Liu B, Ai S, Zhang W, Huang D, Zhang Y. Assessment of the bioavailability, bioaccessibility and transfer of heavy metals in the soil-grain-human systems near a mining and smelting area in NW China. Science of the Total Environment. 2017; 609: 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.215
  14. Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Azooz MM, Nabi G. Generation of ROS and non-enzymatic antioxidants during abiotic stress in plants. Botany Research International. 2009;2(1): 11–20.
  15. Ciavatta C, Manoli C, Cavani L, Franceschi C, Sequi P. Chromium-Containing Organic Fertilizers from Tanned Hides and Skins?: A Review on Chemical, Environmental, Agronomical and Legislative Aspects. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2012;3: 1532–1541. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.311169
  16. Garut DLHK dan PK. Study of the Carrying Capacity and Capacity of the Environment in the Sukaregang Tannery Area, Garut Regency. 2014. p. 1–21.
  17. Qu M, Li W, Zhang C, Huang B, Zhao Y. Assessing the pollution risk of soil Chromium based on loading capacity of paddy soil at a regional scale. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18451
  18. Miao Q, Yan J. Comparison of three ornamental plants for phytoextraction potential of chromium removal from tannery sludge. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2013;15(1):98–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0095-4
  19. Government of Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 82 2001 on Water Quality And Water Pollution Management. 2001.
  20. Nath K, Sharma YK. Chromium in tannery industry effluent and its effect on plant metabolism and growth. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2005; 26(2):197–204.
  21. Liao Y, Min X, Yang Z. Physicochemical and biological quality of soil in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils as affected by chemical and microbial remediation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2013; 21(1) :379–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1919-z
  22. Liu WX, Shen LF, Liu JW, Wang YW, Li SR. Uptake of Toxic Heavy Metals by Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivated in the Agricultural Soil near Zhengzhou City, People ’ s Republic of China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2007; 79(2):209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-007-9164-0
  23. Aladesanmi OT, Oroboade JG, Osisiogu CP. Bioaccumulation Factor of Selected Heavy Metals in Zea mays. Journal of Health and Pollution. 2019; 9(24). https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191207
  24. Clever, Jennifer and Jie, Ma. China’s Maximum Levels for Contaminants in Foods. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report No. CH14058, 2014.
  25. Singh HP, Mahajan P, Kaur S, Batish DR, Kohli RK. Chromium toxicity and tolerance in plants. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2013; 11(3):229–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0407-5
  26. Ali W, Mao K, Zhang H, Junaid M, Xu N, Rasool A. Comprehensive review of the basic chemical behaviours, sources, processes, and endpoints of trace element contamination in paddy soil-rice systems in rice-growing countries. Journal of Hazardous Materials.2020; 397:122720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122720
  27. Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia. Paddy Variety Description. 2000.
  28. Dotaniya ML, Das H, Meena VD. Assessment of chromium efficacy on germination, root elongation, and coleoptile growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at different growth periods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2014; 185(5):2957–2963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3593-5
  29. Xu B, Wang F, Zhang Q, Lan Q, Liu C, Guo X, et al. Influence of iron plaque on the uptake and accumulation of chromium by rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings: Insights from hydroponic and soil cultivation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018;162:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.063
  30. Oliveira H. Chromium as an Environmental Pollutant: Insights on Induced Plant Toxicity. Journal of Botany. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/375843
  31. Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-tavera H, Avudainayagam S. Chromium toxicity in plants. Environment International. 2005; 31:739–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.003

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.