Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Effect of nutrients and spacing on growth characters, yield attributes and yield under high-density planting system of cotton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6161
Submitted
19 November 2024
Published
31-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the farmer's field, Madathanoor village, Pochamapalli taluk, Krishnagiri district, from August to January 2023-2024 and at the Experimental Farm, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, from January to June 2024 to study the yield maximization through agronomic strategies under high-density planting system (HDPS) of cotton. The field experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design with three replications. The experiment comprised 12 treatment combinations containing three levels of nutrients and four levels of spacing. The nutrient levels of N1- 80:40:40 nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium (NPK) kg ha-1 , N2 - 100:50:50 NPK kg ha-1 and N3 - 120:60:60 NPK kg ha-1 recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF) were tried with S1 - 60 x 10 cm, S2 - 60 x 15 cm, S3 - 70 x 10 cm and S4 - 100 x 10 cm spacing. The results revealed that the combination of 120:60:60 NPK kg ha-1 + 60 x 10 cm spacing registered higher plant height. Also, the combination of 120:60:60 NPK kg ha-1 + 100 x 10 cm spacing registered higher leaf area index (LAI) and dry matter production (DMP), yield attributing characters (sympodial branches plant-1 , number of squares plant-1 and boll weight) and seed cotton yield. In controversially, the combination of 120:60:60 NPK kg ha-1 + 60 x 10 cm spacing registered higher plant height.

References

  1. Kaur S, Singh K, Deol JS, Malik S, Kaur N. Effect of plant growth regulators and defoliants on growth and productivity of American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agric Res J. 2021;58(4):650–56. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2021.00092.2
  2. Kairon MS, Laise DB, Venugopalam MV. Cotton. In: Prasad R, editor. Field Crops Production. New Delhi (IN): ICAR; 2004. p. 646–74.
  3. Tariq M, Yasmeen A, Ahmad S, Hussain N, Afzal MN, Hasanuzzaman M. Shedding of fruiting structures in cotton: factors, compensation and prevention. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems. 2017;20(2):251–62.
  4. Constable GA, Bange MP. The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res. 2015;182:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.017
  5. Zubair M, Ibrahim S, Atolani O, Hamid A. Chemical composition and nutritional characterization of cotton seed as potential feed supplement. J Turkish Chem Soc Sec A. 2021;8(4):977–82. https://doi.org/ 10.18596/jotcsa. 906949
  6. AICCIP. All India coordinated cotton improvement project-Annual Report. Coimbatore (IN): Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2016.
  7. AICCIP. All India coordinated cotton improvement project-Annual Report. Coimbatore (IN): Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2019.
  8. OECD-FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 24].
  9. AICRP. ICAR-All India co-ordinated research project on cotton-Annual Report. New Delhi (IN): Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 2023. p. 1–4.
  10. Devi P, Singh K, Sewhag M, Kumar S. Performance of Bt cotton evaluated in relation to mulching and weed control measures in Northwest India. J Cotton Res. 2024;7:35. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3438310/v1
  11. Gunasekaran M, Premalatha N, Kumar M, Mahalingam L, Sakthivel N, Senguttuvan K, et al. Cotton CO17-A short-duration, high-yielding compact variety suitable for high-density planting system. Electron J Plant Breed. 2020;11(4):993–1000. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1104.162
  12. Sudhakar P. Mechanized harvesting in cotton in India– An overview. Asian J Sci Technol. 2013;4(10):145–48.
  13. Vories ED, Glover RE. Comparison of growth and yield components of conventional and ultra-narrow row cotton. J Cotton Sci. 2006;10(3):235–43.
  14. Wright DL, Marois JJ, Sprenkel RK, Rich JR. Production of ultra narrow row cotton. Gainesville (FL): University of Florida, IFAS Extension; 2011. SSAGR-83.
  15. O'Berry NB, Faircloth JC, Jones MA, Herbert DA, Abaye AO, McKemie TE, Brownie C. Differential responses of cotton cultivars when applying mepiquat pentaborate. Agron J. 2009;101(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0333
  16. Khargharate VK, Ghanbahadur M, Hiwale S, Chirde P. Effect of high-density planting, nutrient management and moisture conservation on economics and nutrient uptake of hirsutum cotton under rainfed conditions. J Agric Res Technol. 2019;44(2):138–45.
  17. Shah AN, Iqbal J, Tanveer M, Yang G, Hassan W, Fahad S, et al. Nitrogen fertilization and conservation tillage: a review on growth, yield and greenhouse gas emissions in cotton. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:2261–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7894-4
  18. Iruthayaraj MR, Sivaraj A. Estimation of cotton leaf area. Curr Res. 1979;8(5):83–85.
  19. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York (US): John Wiley and Sons; 2010. p. 97–107.
  20. Malakannavar S, Halepyati AS, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Narayanrao K, Ambika V. Effect of macronutrient and morphoframe manipulation on growth, yield and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Adv Res. 2018;13(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2018/38557
  21. Pyne S, Negi MS, Shukla A, Malik N, Paul J. Effect of NPK nutrition on leaf area index and chlorophyll content of fibre flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Pharma Innov. 2022;11(7):2076–78.
  22. Gu Y, Zhang X, Tu S, Lindström K. Soil microbial biomass, crop yields and bacterial community structure as affected by long-term fertilizer treatments under wheat-rice cropping. Eur J Soil Biol. 2009;45(3):239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.02.005
  23. Anbarasan S, Ramesh S, Sudhakar P, Kumar BS. Effect of cotton varieties and plant spacing on yield and yield components of compact type cotton under HDPS. J Surv Fish Sci. 2023;10(1):3968–74. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v10i1.1822
  24. Kumar A, Karunakar AP, Nath A. Influences of different planting density on growth, yield attributes and yields of hirsutum, arboreum and Bt cotton. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(6):1872–88. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.223
  25. Afzal MN, Tariq M, Ahmad M, Mubeen K, Khan MA, Afzal MU, et al. Dry matter, lint mass and fiber properties of cotton in response to nitrogen application and planting densities. Pak J Agric Res. 2018;32(2):229–40.
  26. Yadav S, Singh H, Kaur M. Effect of plant spacings and fertilizer levels on growth and productivity of desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). Pharma Innov. 2021;10(11):1975–80.
  27. Kavya D, Pragathi KCh, Sreenivas G, Ramprakash T, Triveni S. Influence of varied plant densities and nitrogen doses on growth and yield of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under high density planting system. Int J Environ Climate Change. 2022;12(11):1498–504. DOI: 10.9734/IJECC/2022/v12i1131131
  28. Gouthami R, Nagabhushanam U, Ramanjaneyulu AV, Kamalakar J. Influence of plant geometry and cultivars on growth, yield attributes and yield of HDPS cotton under rainfed shallow soils. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(10):245–50. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102702
  29. Kumar GT, Medhe NK, Danawale NJ, Bhute NK, Patil MR, Patil VS. Effect of plant density and nitrogen levels on yield and soil by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Biol Forum. 2024;16(5):81–84.
  30. Maheswari MU, Krishnasamy SM, Kumar M, Sakthivel N. Effects of plant density and growth retardants on yield and quality of machine sown cotton. Environ Ecol. 2019;37(3):777–85.
  31. Alur A, Halepyati AS, Chittapur BM, Nidagundi JM, Koppalkar BG. Effect of high-density planting and nutrient management on growth and yield of compact cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(4):294–97.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.