Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

A quick method of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol from immature embryos of tropical Indian maize genotypes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7468
Submitted
27 January 2025
Published
23-05-2025 — Updated on 31-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

The principal obstacle in transferring desirable genes is the absence of an efficient regeneration and transformation protocol. In our study, we achieved successful plant regeneration and transformation by employing immature embryos derived from five tropical inbred lines of Zea mays, namely, V390, HK193-2, PV5, PV6 and HK1-163. Notably, the formation of embryogenic calli was observed within a brief 7-day
period and subsequent plant regeneration was accomplished within 30 days from the embryogenic callus on a culture medium containing MS supplemented with 1mg/L 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.1 mg/L Thidiazuron (TDZ). For the transformation experiments, we employed Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 carrying the binary vector pCAMBIA 3301, which includes the bialophos/phosphinothricin resistance (bar) gene and the GUS reporter gene. After successful transformation, the regenerated plants underwent a hardening process and exhibited standard growth patterns. Among the five inbred lines, HKI 163 demonstrated the highest transformation efficiency (10.6
%). The highlight of this protocol was the development of transgenic plants accomplished in a remarkably short period of approximately two months. This advancement sets the stage for future genome editing experiments within these inbred lines.

References

  1. 1. Long Y, Yang Y, Pan G, Shen Y. New insights into tissue culture plant-regeneration mechanisms. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:926752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.926752
  2. 2. Raman R. The impact of Genetically Modified (GM) crops in modern agriculture: A review. GM Crops Food. 2017;8:(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2017.1413522
  3. 3. Que Q, Elumalai S, Li X, Zhong H, Nalapalli S, Schweiner M, et al. Maize transformation technology development for commercial event generation. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00379
  4. 4. Yadava P, Abhishek A, Singh R, Singh I, Kaul T, Pattanayak A, et al. Advances in maize transformation technologies and the development of transgenic maize. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 7:1949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01949
  5. 5. Kausch AP, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Hague J, Mookkan M, Quemada H, Dellaporta S, et al. Edit at will: genotype-independent plant transformation in the era of advanced genomics and genome editing. Plant Sci. 2017;281:186–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.006
  6. 6. Ishida Y, Hiei Y, Komari T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize. NatProtoc. 2007;2(7):1614–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.241
  7. 7. Armstrong CL, Green CE. Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize
  8. callus and the involvement of L-proline. Planta. 1985;164:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396083
  9. 8. Hansen G, Wright MS. Recent advances in the transformation of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4:226–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01412-0
  10. 9. Masters A, Kang M, McCaw, Zobrist JD, Gordon-Kamm W, Jones T, et al. Agrobacterium- mediated immature embryo transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred lines using morphogenic genes. J Vis Exp. 2020;156. https://doi.org/10.3791/60782
  11. 10. Carvalho CHS, Bohorova N, Bordallo PN, Abreu LL, Valicente FH, Bressan W, et al. Type II callus production and plant regeneration in tropical maize genotypes. Plant Cell Rep.1997;17:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050355
  12. 11. Oduor RO, Njagi ENM, Ndungu S, Machuka JS. In vitro regeneration of dryland Kenyan maize genotypes through somatic embryogenesis. Int J Bot. 2006;2:146–51. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijb.2006.146.151 .
  13. 12. Omer RA, Ali AM, Matheka JM, Machuka J. Regeneration of Sudanese maize inbred lines and open pollinated varieties. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7(11):1759–64. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB08.856
  14. 13. Kumar A, Kaushik M, Mulani E, Roy J, Phogat S, Sareen B, et al. Low titre of agroinoculum with prolonged incubation period and low auxin concentration in the regeneration media are the key to high frequency of transformation in climate-resilient Aus-type rice genotype Nagina 22. 3 Biotech. 2025;15(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-025-04210-y
  15. 14. Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho MJ, et al. Morphogenic regulators baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. The Plant Cell. 2016;28(9):1998–2015. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00124
  16. 15. Yassitepe JECT, da Silva VCH, Hernandes-Lopes J.,Dante RA, Gerhardt IR, Fernandes FR, da Silva PA, Vieira LR, Bonatti V, Aruda P. Maize transformation: From plant material to the release of genetically modified and edited varieties. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:766702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.766702 .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.