Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Understanding the factors influencing the environmental stewardship of precision farming farmers - A systematic literature review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8049
Submitted
3 March 2025
Published
24-05-2025 — Updated on 09-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

Precision farming has emerged as a transformative approach to enhance resource efficiency and minimize environmental impact as agriculture confronts more and more sustainability concerns. This systematic literature review delves into key factors influencing environmental stewardship in the context of farmers embracing precision farming using the Theory, Contexts, Characteristics and Methods (TCCM) framework. Well-screened data obtained from the Web of Science database published between 2002 and 2024, 40 relevant studies being reviewed through bibliometric and thematic content analysis using R Studio and VOS viewer. Findings revealed a steady increase in precision farming research, led by the United States, Agriculture and Human Values as the most cited journal and Finger’s (2019) work has received the most citations. Key findings pointed out that social norms, economic incentives and government policies as significant determinants of farmers’ environmental stewardship. Despite advancements, farmers are still confined by resource scarcity, knowledge gap and differences of opinion about environmental issues. This review marks the necessity of targeted interventions as a panacea to the barriers, encouraging ecological resilience and sustainability in agriculture.

References

  1. 1. Davy CM, Ford AT, Fraser KC. Aeroconservation for the fragmented skies. Conservation Letters. 2017;10(6):773-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12347
  2. 2. Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E, Pittman J, Bassett H, Gelcich S, et al. Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management. 2018;61:597-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
  3. 3. Šūmane S, Kunda I, Knickel K, Strauss A, Tisenkopfs T, Des Los Rios I, et al. Integration of knowledge for sustainable agriculture: why local farmer knowledge matters; 2016.
  4. 4. Zecca F, Rastorgueva N. Trends and perspectives of the information asymmetry between consumers and Italian traditional food producers. Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition & Agriculture. 2016;8(1):19-24.
  5. 5. Laurett R, Paco A, Mainardes EW. Measuring sustainable development, its antecedents, barriers and consequences in agriculture: An exploratory factor analysis. Environmental Development. 2021;37:100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100583
  6. 6. Durán Gabela C, Trejos B, Lamiño Jaramillo P, Boren-Alpízar A. Sustainable agriculture: Relationship between knowledge and attitude among university students. Sustainability. 2022;14(23):15523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315523
  7. 7. Balafoutis A, Beck B, Fountas S, Vangeyte J, Van der Wal T, Soto I, et al. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability. 2017;9(8):1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081339
  8. 8. Lee C-L, Strong R, Dooley KE. Analyzing precision agriculture adoption across the globe: A systematic review of scholarship from 1999–2020. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810295
  9. 9. Schimmelpfennig D, Ebel R. Sequential adoption and cost savings from precision agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2016;41(1):97-115.
  10. 10. Belcore E, Angeli S, Colucci E, Musci MA, Aicardi I. Precision agriculture workflow, from data collection to data management using FOSS tools: an application in northern Italy vineyard. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021;10(4):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040236
  11. 11. Torky M, Hassanein AE. Integrating blockchain and the internet of things in precision agriculture: Analysis, opportunities, and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;178:105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105476
  12. 12. Zhao W, Li T, Qi B, Nie Q, Runge T. Terrain analytics for precision agriculture with automated vehicle sensors and data fusion. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052905
  13. 13. Schimmelpfennig D. Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture; 2016. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.249773
  14. 14. Romanelli TL, Muñoz-Arriola F, Colaço AF. Conceptual framework to integrate economic drivers of decision-making for technology adoption in agriculture. Engineering Proceedings. 2022;9(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2021009043
  15. 15. Pierpaoli E, Carli G, Pignatti E, Canavari M. Drivers of precision agriculture technologies adoption: a literature review. Procedia Technology. 2013;8:61-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.010
  16. 16. Medici M, Pedersen SM, Carli G, Tagliaventi MR. Environmental benefits of precision agriculture adoption. Economia Agro-alimentare: XXI, 3, 2019. 2019:637-56.
  17. 17. Cisternas I, Velásquez I, Caro A, Rodríguez A. Systematic literature review of implementations of precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;176:105626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105626
  18. 18. Loures L, Chamizo A, Ferreira P, Loures A, Castanho R, Panagopoulos T. Assessing the effectiveness of precision agriculture management systems in mediterranean small farms. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093765
  19. 19. Baldwin C, Smith T, Jacobson C. Love of the land: Social-ecological connectivity of rural landholders. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017;51:37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.012
  20. 20. Berenguer J, Corraliza JA, Martin R. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005;21(2):128-38. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.128
  21. 21. Gottlieb PD, Schilling BJ, Sullivan K, Esseks JD, Lynch L, Duke JM. Are preserved farms actively engaged in agriculture and conservation? Land Use Policy. 2015;45:103-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.013
  22. 22. Manesh Choubey MC. Organic agriculture in Sikkim: challenges and future strategy. 2016;73(9):28-33.
  23. 23. Meek D, Anderson CR. Scale and the politics of the organic transition in Sikkim, India. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2020;44(5):653-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1701171
  24. 24. Upadhyay A, Rai S. Farmer’s perception on impact of climate change and adaptive strategies in Sikkim Himalaya. India II: Climate Change Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation in Developing Countries. Springer; 2022. p. 279-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94395-0_12
  25. 25. Bosnjak M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe's Journal of Psychology. 2020;16(3):352. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107
  26. 26. Khaspuria G, Khandelwal A, Agarwal M, Bafna M, Yadav R, Yadav A. Adoption of precision agriculture technologies among farmers: A comprehensive review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 2024;30(7):671-86. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72180
  27. 27. Kleftodimos G, Kyrgiakos LS, Kleisiari C, Tagarakis AC, Bochtis D. Examining farmers’ adoption decisions towards precision-agricultural practices in Greek dairy cattle farms. Sustainability. 2021;14(1):411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010411
  28. 28. Paul J, Criado AR. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review. 2020;29(4):101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  29. 29. Paul J, Singh G. The 45 years of foreign direct investment research: Approaches, advances and analytical areas. The World Economy. 2017;40(11):2512-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12502
  30. 30. Rosado-Serrano A, Paul J, Dikova D. International franchising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2018;85:238-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049
  31. 31. Gopalakrishnan S, Padhyegurjar S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. JK Science. 2013;15(1):48.
  32. 32. Dhaliwal A, Singh DP, Paul J. The consumer behavior of luxury goods: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 2020;33(1):66-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1758198
  33. 33. Genero M, Fernández-Saez AM, Nelson HJ, Poels G, Piattini M. Research review: a systematic literature review on the quality of UML models. Journal of Database Management (JDM). 2011;22(3):46-70. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2011070103
  34. 34. Paul J, Rosado-Serrano A. Gradual internationalization vs born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review. 2019;36(6):830-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280
  35. 35. Talwar S, Talwar M, Kaur P, Dhir A. Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2020;28(4):286-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.014
  36. 36. Liang Z, Liu X, Xiong J, Xiao J. Water allocation and integrative management of precision irrigation: A systematic review. Water. 2020;12(11):3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113135
  37. 37. Finger R, Swinton SM, El Benni N, Walter A. Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2019;11(1):313-35. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929
  38. 38. Weersink A, Fraser E, Pannell D, Duncan E, Rotz S. Opportunities and challenges for big data in agricultural and environmental analysis. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2018;10(1):19-37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654
  39. 39. Coble KH, Mishra AK, Ferrell S, Griffin T. Big data in agriculture: A challenge for the future. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2018;40(1):79-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx056
  40. 40. Prause L, Hackfort S, Lindgren M. Digitalization and the third food regime. Agriculture and Human Values. 2021;38:641-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10161-2
  41. 41. Selva Ganapathi R, Shanthasheela M. A systematic literature review on adoption and impact of micro-irrigation. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 2024;15(8):4035. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.256
  42. 42. Ozdemir MA, Goktas LS. Research trends on digital detox holiday: a bibliometric analysis, 2012-2020. Tourism & Management Studies. 2021;17(3):21-35. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2021.170302
  43. 43. Guo Y-M, Huang Z-L, Guo J, Li H, Guo X-R, Nkeli MJ. Bibliometric analysis on smart cities research. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133606
  44. 44. Lim WM, Yap S-F, Makkar M. Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? Journal of Business Research. 2021;122:534-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.051
  45. 45. Masi M, De Rosa M, Vecchio Y, Bartoli L, Adinolfi F. The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture. Agricultural and Food Economics. 2022;10(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-022-00236-5
  46. 46. Troiano S, Carzedda M, Marangon F. Better richer than environmentally friendly? Describing preferences toward and factors affecting precision agriculture adoption in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics. 2023;11(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-023-00247-w
  47. 47. Khanna M, Miao R. Inducing the adoption of emerging technologies for sustainable intensification of food and renewable energy production: insights from applied economics. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2022;66(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12461
  48. 48. Thompson NM, Bir C, Widmar DA, Mintert JR. Farmer perceptions of precision agriculture technology benefits. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 2019;51(1):142-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2018.27
  49. 49. Anand A, Sharma M. Social norms moderating the attitude-intention relationship in adopting. Marketing. 2023;19(4):284-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(4).2023.23
  50. 50. Langer G, Kühl S. Perception and acceptance of robots in dairy farming—A cluster analysis of German citizens. Agriculture and Human Values. 2024;41(1):249-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10483-x
  51. 51. Bullock DS, Lowenberg‐DeBoer J, Swinton SM. Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site‐specific yield response. Agricultural Economics. 2002;27(3):233-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00119.x
  52. 52. Florax RJ, Voortman RL, Brouwer J. Spatial dimensions of precision agriculture: a spatial econometric analysis of millet yield on Sahelian coversands. Agricultural Economics. 2002;27(3):425-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00129.x
  53. 53. Abuova AB, Tulkubayeva SA, Tulayev YV, Somova SV, Kizatova MZ. Sustainable development of crop production with elements of precision agriculture in Northern Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. 2020;7(4): 3200-14.
  54. 54. DeLay ND, Thompson NM, Mintert JR. Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2022;73(1):195-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12440
  55. 55. Thompson B, Leduc G, Manevska‐Tasevska G, Toma L, Hansson H. Farmers' adoption of ecological practices: A systematic literature map. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2024;75(1):84-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12545
  56. 56. Hao X, Demir E. Artificial intelligence in supply chain decision-making: an environmental, social, and governance triggering and technological inhibiting protocol. Journal of Modelling in Management. 2024;19(2):605-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2023-0009
  57. 57. Li X, Zhang J, Long H, Chen Y, Zhang A. Optimization of digital information management of financial services based on artificial intelligence in the digital financial environment. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC). 2023;35(3):1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.318478
  58. 58. Kountios G, Bournaris T, Papadavid G, Michailidis A, Papadaki-Klavdianou A. Exploring educational needs of young farmers in precision agriculture in Serres, Greece, and the perspective of innovative agricultural educational programs. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development. 2018;11(1):4-14. https://doi.org/10.1504/JIBED.2018.090034
  59. 59. Duncan E, Glaros A, Ross DZ, Nost E. New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. 2021;38:1181-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10244-8
  60. 60. Soma T, Nuckchady B. Communicating the benefits and risks of digital agriculture technologies: Perspectives on the future of digital agricultural education and training. Frontiers in Communication. 2021;6:762201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.762201
  61. 61. Moretti DM, Baum CM, Wustmans M, Bröring S. Application of journey maps to the development of emergent sustainability‐oriented technologies: Lessons for user involvement in agriculture. Business Strategy & Development. 2022;5(3):209-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.192
  62. 62. Finger R. Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2023;50(4):1277-309. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021
  63. 63. Miine LK, Akorsu AD, Boampong O, Bukari S. Effects of digital agriculture solutions on smallscale wage workers and employment. Cogent Social Sciences. 2024;10(1):2329782. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2329782
  64. 64. Huber R, Späti K, Finger R. A behavioural agent-based modelling approach for the ex-ante assessment of policies supporting precision agriculture. Ecological Economics. 2023;212:107936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107936
  65. 65. Smidt HJ, Jokonya O. Towards a framework to implement a digital agriculture value chain in South Africa for small-scale farmers. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management. 2022;16:746. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.746
  66. 66. Thomson L. Leveraging the value from digitalization: a business model exploration of new technology-based firms in vertical farming. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2022;33(9):88-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2021-0422
  67. 67. Bekee B, Segovia MS, Valdivia C. Adoption of smart farm networks: a translational process to inform digital agricultural technologies. Agriculture and Human Values. 2024;41:1573-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10566-3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.