Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Effect of PGPR-enriched biofertilizers from handmade paper industry effluents on green chilli (Capsicum frutescens) cultivation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8087
Submitted
5 March 2025
Published
24-05-2025 — Updated on 09-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

The handmade paper industry utilizing non-woody raw materials such as cow-dung produces an organic-matter rich effluent which is relatively less harmful to environment. In this study, a novel biofertilizer formulated by enriching this effluent with selected Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) was tested for its biofertilizing potential against the NU1919 variety of green chilli (Capsicum frutescens). The study was conducted using four treatments in triplicates with the Randomized Block Design. Parameters related to plant growth promotion-including number of fruits per plant, average fruit length, fruit yield per plant, average plant height and number of branches-were recorded. The best performance was observed in Set D, which used a consortium of Azotobacter sp. and Enterobacter sp. along with unautoclaved effluent (raw liquor, RL). Similarly, average girth and average fruit weight (fresh and dry weight) were also recorded to be maximum in the red chillies harvested from this Set D. The maximum shoot length was found to be in Set D, whereas the maximum root length was observed in Set A which used the RL without any additional bacterial cultures. Vitamin A was found to be maximum in the case of Set A, whereas Vitamin C was found to be almost equal in two Sets (Set A, 167.79 mg/100 g and Set D, 167.30 mg/100 g). The experimental Set C with Bacillus and Azotobacter showed maximum capsaicinoid content (67793.18 SHU). This study highlights the potential of PGPR-enriched biofertilizers, formulated using effluent from the handmade paper industry, for enhancing chilli cultivation.

References

  1. 1. Nourani V, Elkiran G, Abba SI. Wastewater treatment plant performance analysis using artificial intelligence–an ensemble approach. Water Science and Technology. 2018;78(10):2064-76. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.477
  2. 2. Hao RX, Liu F, Ren HQ, Cheng SY. Study on a comprehensive evaluation method for the assessment of the operational efficiency of wastewater treatment plants. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 2013;27:747-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0637-2
  3. 3. Hejabi N, Saghebian SM, Aalami MT, Nourani V. Evaluation of the effluent quality parameters of wastewater treatment plant based on uncertainty analysis and post-processing approaches (case study). Water Science and Technology. 2021;83(7):1633-48. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.067
  4. 4. Rame R, PurwantoP, Sudarno S. Catalytic ozonation: a potential game-changer in wastewater treatment. The 4th Seminar and Workshop in Public Health Action (ISWOPHA) September 25-26, 2023; 2024.
  5. 5. Narayana S, Sathiasivan K, Chauhan S, Rajesh M. Waste-liquors generated during handmade paper manufacture from cow dung as a potential source of biofertilizer. Journal of Applied & Natural Science. 2024;16(1):400-9. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v16i1.5209
  6. 6. Basu SK, De AK. Capsicum: historical and botanical perspectives. In: Capsicum. CRC Press; 2003. p. 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203381151-8
  7. 7. Surya R, Tedjakusuma F. Diversity of sambals, traditional Indonesian chili pastes. Journal of Ethnic Foods. 2022;9(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-022-00142-7
  8. 8. Govindarajan VS, Rajalakshmi D, Chand N, Salzer UJ. Capsicum-Production, technology, chemistry and quality. Part IV. Evaluation of quality. Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition. 1987;25(3):185282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398709527453
  9. 9. Singh SA, Uddin MO, Khan MM, Singh SA, Chishti AS, Bhat UH. Therapeutic properties of capsaicin: a medicinally important bio-active constituent of chilli pepper. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2022;15(7):47-58. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i7.44405
  10. 10. Pandit MK, Pandit R, Bairagi S. Chilli. In: Ethnopharmacological investigation of Indian spices. IGI Global; 2020. p. 253-68. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2524-1.ch018
  11. 11. Santos VA, Santos RA, Silva ES, Alves AS, Ferrareia RO, Junior ARC. Chemical composition and biological activities of the species Capsicum frutescens 1 (chili pepper)-a literature review. Exact and Earth Sciences. 2023. https://doi.org/10.56238/alookdevelopv1-167
  12. 12. Wahua C, Okoli BE, Sam SM. Comparative morphological, anatomical, cytological and phytochemical studies on Capsicum frutescens Linn. and Capsicum annuum Linn. (Solanaceae). International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 2013;4(1):1-1.
  13. 13. Bal S, Sharangi AB, Upadhyay TK, Khan F, Pandey P, Siddiqui S, et al. Biomedical and antioxidant potentialities in chilli: Perspectives and way forward. Molecules. 2022;27(19):6380. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196380
  14. 14. Coico R, editor. Current protocols in microbiology. Wiley; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00
  15. 15. Borah R, Malngiang L, Odyuo N, Choudhury H. Development of an effective sterilisation procedure for exposed seeds from the dehisced capsule using centrifugation method and successful asymbiotic seed germination in Phaius tankervilleae (Banks ex L'Herit) Bl. The Journal of Plant Science Research. 2022;38(1):195-204. https://doi.org/10.32381/JPSR.2022.38.01.20
  16. 16. Sikarwar H, Seetpal MK, Singh N, Deb P. Effect of NPK and biofertilizers on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annum L.). Biological Forum-An International Journal. 2023;15(2) 73-7.
  17. 17. Kanchana D, Jayanthi M, Saranraj P, Sujitha D. Prevelence of Azotobacter sp. in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) rhizosphere soil of Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Microbiological Research. 2013;4:296-9. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijmr.2013.4.3.81151
  18. 18. Jadhav PB, Dekhane SS, Saravaiya SN, Tekale GS, Patil SJ, Patel DJ. Effect of nitrogen fixing Azotobacter and Azospirillum on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum sp.L) CV Acharya. International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies. 2014;13(5):827-32.
  19. 19. Audipudi AV, Kumar NP, Ruthu R, Srivalli K, Surekha P, Sirisha CH, et al. In vitro studies of plant growth promoting activities of rhizospheric Bacillus sp in Chilli Seedlings Variety LCA344. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;Special Issue-5:92-106. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10310.89923
  20. 20. Chakraborty P, Sarker RK, Roy R, Ghosh A, Maiti D, Tribedi P. Bioaugmentation of soil with Enterobacter cloacae AKS7 enhances soil nitrogen content and boosts soil microbial functional-diversity. 3 Biotech. 2019;9(7):253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1791-8
  21. 21. Nutaratat P, Monprasit A, Srisuk N. High-yield production of indole-3-acetic acid by Enterobacter sp. DMKU-RP206, a rice phyllosphere bacterium that possesses plant growth-promoting traits. 3 Biotech. 2017;7:305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0937-9
  22. 22. Costa LM, Moura NF, Marangoni C, Mendes CE, Teixeira AD. Antioxidant activities of peppers of the genus Capsicum. Food Science and Technology. 2010;30:51-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009005000004
  23. 23. Pinto CM, de Oliveira Pinto CL, Donzeles SM. Pimenta Capsicum: propriedadesquímicas, nutricionais, farmacológicas e medicinais e seupotencial para o agronegócio. Revista Brasileira de Agropecuária Sustentável. 2013;3(2). https://doi.org/10.21206/rbas.v3i2.225
  24. 24. Valverde RMV. Composição bromatológica da pimenta malagueta in naturae processada em conserva. Itapetinga (BA): UESB; 2011. 54p. (dissertação - mestrado em engenharia de alimentos - engenharia de processos de alimentos).
  25. 25. Zampieri FG. Caracterização morfoagronômica, avaliação da composição química e atividade antimicrobiana de óleorresina de pimentas do Gênero Capsicum; 2022. https://repositorio.ifes.edu.br/handle/123456789/2104

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.