Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Greywater footprints and the sustainability of city gardens

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8162
Submitted
10 March 2025
Published
24-05-2025 — Updated on 09-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

Urban city gardens are facing increasing pressure to balance water consumption with sustainability goals, to amid growing concerns over water scarcity and environmental degradation. This article examines the concept of “greywater footprints” and its potential to support sustainability in urban city gardens. Greywater, which is the waste produced from household activities excluding toilet use, has become a useful resource for irrigating urban gardens, helping to decrease the dependency on drinking water and easing the strain on freshwater resources. By redirecting greywater from conventional wastewater systems, urban gardens can significantly reduce their water usage while also promoting sustainable practices. Its composition varies depending on its source, which is primarily kitchen and detergent waste, with probable chemical changes from laundry and bathing. Its use in urban gardens saves water while also improving soil fertility and plant health, contributing to the overall sustainability and productivity of urban agricultural systems. This article examines the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing nature-based systems for the treatment of greywater, highlighting their minimal energy consumption, environmental advantages and cost efficiency. It also examines how greywater contributes to enhancing resilience in urban gardens, facilitating climate adaptation and reducing environmental impact. In summary, adopting greywater management techniques in city gardens provides a sustainable approach to addressing water scarcity challenges while promoting the development of thriving, productive and resilient urban ecosystems. By leveraging greywater resources, urban environments can contribute to a more sustainable future for both urban agriculture and water management.

References

  1. 1. Al-Hamaiedeh H, Bino M. Effect of treated grey water reuse in irrigation on soil and plants. Desalination. 2010;256(1-3):115-9. https://doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.02.004
  2. 2. Anangadan SM, Pradhan S, Saththasivam J, McKay G, Mackey HR. Evaluation of greywater as a sustainable source of irrigation for ornamental crops in green walls-a study of plant and soil using Ruellia tuberosa. Sustainability. 2024;16(3):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031183
  3. 3. Gaberščik A, Grašič M, Vogel-Mikuš K, Germ M, Golob A. Water shortage strongly alters formation of calcium oxalate druse crystals and leaf traits in Fagopyrum esculentum. Plants. 2020;9(7):917. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070917
  4. 4. Ghrab M, Masmoudi M, Ben Mechlia N, editors. Water productivity in fruit trees orchards under water scarcity. VIII International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 1150; 2015. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1150.45
  5. 5. Knight J, Abdi DE, Ingram DL, Fernandez RT. Water scarcity footprint analysis of container-grown plants in a model research nursery as affected by irrigation and fertilization treatments. Water. 2019;11(12):2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122436
  6. 6. Aboelata A. Assessment of green roof benefits on buildings’ energy-saving by cooling outdoor spaces in different urban densities in arid cities. Energy. 2021;219:119514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119514
  7. 7. Fang Y-K, Wang H-C, Fang P-H, Liang B, Zheng K, Sun Q, et al. Life cycle assessment of integrated bioelectrochemical-constructed wetland system: environmental sustainability and economic feasibility evaluation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2023;189:106740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106740
  8. 8. Lee LS, Jim CY. Energy benefits of green-wall shading based on novel-accurate apportionment of short-wave radiation components. Applied Energy. 2019;238:1506-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.161
  9. 9. Bergame N. Acknowledging contradictions–endorsing change: transforming the urban through gardening. Capitalism Nature Socialism. 2023;34(1):69-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2022.2129399
  10. 10. Ikeda M, Akiyama Y, Wiesenberg S. The role of urban gardening in global cities: three case studies in Berlin, Rome and Tokyo. In: Sustainable health through food, nutrition and lifestyle. Springer; 2023. p. 245-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7230-0_14
  11. 11. Catalano C, Pasta S, Guarino R. A plant sociological procedure for the ecological design and enhancement of urban green infrastructure. In: Urban services to ecosystems: green infrastructure benefits from the landscape to the urban scale; 2021. p. 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_3
  12. 12. Pava Meza PA. Vegetación urbana como estrategia para reducir la contaminación del aire en áreas urbanas; 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10654/36084
  13. 13. Tian L. Analysis of the artistic effect of garden plant landscaping in urban greening. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022;2022(1):2430067. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2430067
  14. 14. Raposo M, da Conceição Castro M, Pinto-Gomes C, editors. Urban spaces as a phytogenetic reserve. International Symposium: New Metropolitan Perspectives. Springer; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06825-6_163
  15. 15. Semeraro T, Aretano R, Pomes A, editors. Green infrastructure to improve ecosystem services in the landscape urban regeneration. IOP conference series: materials Science and engineering; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/8/082044
  16. 16. Glover TD. Social capital in the lived experiences of community gardeners. Leisure Sciences. 2004;26(2):143-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400490432064
  17. 17. Firth C, Maye D, Pearson D. Developing “community” in community gardens. Local Environment. 2011;16(6):555-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.586025
  18. 18. Jim CY. Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities. 2004;21(4):311-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.004
  19. 19. Hoekstra AY. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Routledge; 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775526
  20. 20. Vaca-Jiménez S, Vásquez G, Palacios-Encalada JL. Grey water footprint of thermal power plants in ecuador. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems. 2023;11(2):1-18. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d11.0457
  21. 21. Ansorge L, Stejskalová L, Soldán P. Grey water footprint of contaminants of emerging concern from wasterwater in Sava River Basin. Acta Hydrotechnica. 2022;35(63):11728. https://doi.org/10.15292/acta.hydro.2022.09
  22. 22. Stejskalová L, Ansorge L, Kučera J, Vološinová D. Grey water footprint as a tool for wastewater treatment plant assessment–Hostivice case study. Urban Water Journal. 2021;18(10):796-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1941134
  23. 23. Song G, Dai C, Tan Q, Zhang S. Agricultural water management model based on grey water footprints under uncertainty and its application. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205567
  24. 24. Pellicer-Martínez F, Martínez-Paz JM. Grey water footprint assessment at the river basin level: Accounting method and case study in the Segura River Basin, Spain. Ecological Indicators. 2016;60:1173-83.
  25. 25. Liu W, Antonelli M, Liu X, Yang H. Towards improvement of grey water footprint assessment: With an illustration for global maize cultivation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;147:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.072
  26. 26. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. Global gray water footprint and water pollution levels related to anthropogenic nitrogen loads to freshwater. Environmental Science & Technology. 2015;49(21):12860-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03191
  27. 27. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK. Globalization of water: Sharing the planet's freshwater resources. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
  28. 28. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain A, Martinez-Aldaya M, Mekonnen M. Water footprint manual: State of the art 2009; 2009.
  29. 29. SABMiller W. Water footprinting: identifying & addressing water risks in the value chain. SABMiller, Woking, UK and WWF-UK, Goldalming, UK; 2009.
  30. 30. Mancebo F. Gardening the city: addressing sustainability and adapting to global warming through urban agriculture. Environments. 2018;5(3):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5030038
  31. 31. Gunawardena KR, Wells MJ, Kershaw T. Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;584:104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158
  32. 32. Humaida N, Saputra M, Hadiyan Y, editors. Urban gardening for mitigating heat island effect. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1133/1/012048
  33. 33. Kloss P, Khalil HAEE, Lotfata A. Greenery measures to mitigate urban heat island in unplanned areas: Imbaba, Giza, Egypt. Remapping Urban Heat Island Atlases in Regenerative Cities. IGI Global; 2022. p. 109-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2462-9.ch006
  34. 34. Jamei E, Tapper N. WSUD and urban heat island effect mitigation. Approaches to water sensitive urban design. Elsevier; 2019. p. 381-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00019-8
  35. 35. Vásquez-Álvarez PE, Flores-Vázquez C, Cobos-Torres J-C, Cobos-Mora SL. Urban heat island mitigation through planned simulation. Sustainability. 2022;14(14):8612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148612
  36. 36. Hayes AT, Jandaghian Z, Lacasse MA, Gaur A, Lu H, Laouadi A, et al. Nature-based solutions (nbss) to mitigate urban heat island (UHI) effects in Canadian cities. Buildings. 2022;12(7):925. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070925
  37. 37. Ming T, Lian S, Wu Y, Shi T, Peng C, Fang Y, et al. Numerical investigation on the urban heat island effect by using a porous media model. Energies. 2021;14(15):4681. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154681
  38. 38. Maruthu M, Shanmugavel D. A sustainable urban engineering complexity: the built environment-induced urban heat island effect in rapidly urbanizing regions; 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2554251/v1
  39. 39. Taha H. Heat islands and energy; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00394-6
  40. 40. Li A, Zhu Y, Li Y. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning. Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39581-9
  41. 41. Müller N, Kuttler W, Barlag A-B. Counteracting urban climate change: adaptation measures and their effect on thermal comfort. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2014;115:243-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0890-4
  42. 42. Van de Walle A, Kim M, Alam MK, Wang X, Wu D, Dash SR, et al. Greywater reuse as a key enabler for improving urban wastewater management. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology. 2023;16:100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100277
  43. 43. Ghausi SA, Muzzammil M. Grey water characterization and its management. In: Water resources management and reservoir operation: hydraulics, water resources and coastal engineering. Springer, Cham; 2021. p. 251-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79400-2_21
  44. 44. Gautam D, Dahiya P. Strategic re-use and recycling of grey water through treatment systems for resource recovery. In: Microbial technologies for wastewater recycling and management. CRC Press; 2022. p. 281-95. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003231738
  45. 45. Hijikata N. On-site use of reclaimed greywater. In: Resource-oriented agro-sanitation systems: concept, business model and technology. Tokyo: Springer; 2019. p. 243-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56835-3_16
  46. 46. Hajlaoui H, Akrimi R, Sayehi S, Hachicha S. Usage of treated greywater as an alternative irrigation source for tomatoes cultivation. Water and Environment Journal. 2022;36(3):484-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12780
  47. 47. Abdulqader RS, Memduhe AE. Determination the effects of grey water irrigation in chlorophylls a, b pigments concentrations and some primary products in Vicia faba and Citrullus lanatus and some soil properties. Tikrit Journal of Pure Science. 2017;22(5):45-54.
  48. 48. Misra R, Patel JH, Baxi V. Reuse potential of laundry greywater for irrigation based on growth, water and nutrient use of tomato. Journal of Hydrology. 2010;386(1-4):95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.010
  49. 49. Friedler E. Quality of individual domestic greywater streams and its implication for on-site treatment and reuse possibilities. Environmental Technology. 2004;25(9):997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2004.9619393
  50. 50. Wiel-Shafran A, Ronen Z, Weisbrod N, Adar E, Gross A. Potential changes in soil properties following irrigation with surfactant-rich greywater. Ecological Engineering. 2006;26(4):348-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.12.008
  51. 51. Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Henze M, Ledin A. Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban water. 2002;4(1):85-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4
  52. 52. Gross A, Kaplan D, Baker K. Removal of chemical and microbiological contaminants from domestic greywater using a recycled vertical flow bioreactor (RVFB). Ecological Engineering. 2007;31(2):107-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.06.006
  53. 53. Eriksson E, Donner E. Metals in greywater: sources, presence and removal efficiencies. Desalination. 2009;248(1-3):271-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.065
  54. 54. Matos C, Sampaio A, Bentes I. Greywater use in irrigation: characteristics, advantages and concerns. In: Irrigation-water management, pollution and alternative strategies. University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal; 2012. p. 159-84.
  55. 55. Rashid ARM, Bhuiyan MA, Pramanik B, Jayasuriya N. A comparison of environmental impacts between rainwater harvesting and rain garden scenarios. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2022;159:198-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.047
  56. 56. Al-Zou'by JY, Al-Zboon KK, Al-Tabbal JA. Low-cost treatment of grey water and reuse for irrigation of home garden plants. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ). 2017;16(2): 351-9. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.035
  57. 57. Irawanto R, editor. Phytoremediation model of greywater treatment in the Purwodadi Botanic Garden. IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012078
  58. 58. Grieve C, Poss J, Grattan S, Shouse P, Lieth J, Zeng L. Productivity and mineral nutrition of Limonium species irrigated with saline wastewaters. HortiScience. 2005;40(3):654-8.
  59. 59. Niu G, Rodriguez DS. Relative salt tolerance of selected herbaceous perennials and groundcovers. Scientia Horticulturae. 2006;110(4):352-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.020
  60. 60. Niu G, Rodriguez DS, Aguiniga L. Effect of saline water irrigation on growth and physiological responses of three rose rootstocks. HortScience. 2008;43(5):1479-84. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.5.1479
  61. 61. Cassaniti C, Leonardi C, Flowers TJ. The effects of sodium chloride on ornamental shrubs. Scientia Horticulturae. 2009;122(4):586-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.032
  62. 62. Niu G, Rodriguez DS, Starman T. Response of bedding plants to saline water irrigation. HortScience. 2010;45(4):628-36. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.4.628
  63. 63. Villarino GH, Mattson NS. Assessing tolerance to sodium chloride salinity in fourteen floriculture species. HortTechnology. 2011;21(5):539-45. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.539
  64. 64. Licata M, La Bella S, Leto C, Virga G, Leone R, Bonsangue G, et al. Reuse of urban-treated wastewater from a pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow system in Sicily (Italy) for irrigation of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (l.) Pers.) turf under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(48-49):23343-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1180479
  65. 65. Gurjar D, Kaur R. Impact of wastewater irrigations and planting methods on leaf firing, colour, quality and traffic tolerance of turfgrass. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2018;39(1):117-21. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/39/1/MRN-662
  66. 66. de Souza AO, de Carvalho Feitoza M, Borsatto RS, Coffani-Nunes JV, do Nascimento APB. Urban gardens: contribution of small green spaces to sustainable drainage. Periódico Eletrônico Fórum Ambiental da Alta Paulista. 2022;18(3). https://doi.org/10.17271/1980082718320223400
  67. 67. Gómez-Villarino MT, Briz T. With sustainable use of local inputs, urban agriculture delivers community benefits beyond food. California Agriculture. 2022;76(4). https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2022a0013
  68. 68. Scheromm P, Javelle A. Gardening in an urban farm: A way to reconnect citizens with the soil. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2022;72:127590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127590
  69. 69. Chapman EJ, Small GE, Shrestha P. Investigating potential hydrological ecosystem services in urban gardens through soil amendment experiments and hydrologic models. Urban Ecosystems. 2022;25(3):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01191-7
  70. 70. Xuan XY, Zhang HX. Application of rainwater garden in economical ecological urban landscape. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013;409:800-5. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.409-410.800
  71. 71. Byrne J. Mains Water Neutral Gardening: An integrated approach to water conservation in sustainable urban gardens: Murdoch University; 2016.
  72. 72. Wong TH. An overview of water sensitive urban design practices in Australia. Water Practice and Technology. 2006;1(1):wpt2006018. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2006.018
  73. 73. Stefanatou A, Schiza S, Petousi I, Rizzo A, Masi F, Stasinakis AS, et al. Use of climbing and ornamental plants in vertical flow constructed wetlands treating greywater. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2023;53:103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103832
  74. 74. Stefanatou A, Markoulatou E, Koukmenidis I, Vouzi L, Petousi I, Stasinakis AS, et al. Use of ornamental plants in floating treatment wetlands for greywater treatment in urban areas. Science of The Total Environment. 2024;912:169448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169448
  75. 75. Al-Mefleh NK, Othman YA, Tadros MJ, Al-Assaf A, Talozi S. An assessment of treated greywater reuse in irrigation on growth and protein content of Prosopis and Albizia. Horticulturae. 2021;7(3):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030038
  76. 76. Melo MRdS, Dias NdS, de Medeiros IJN, Travassos KD, Miranda NdO, Gurgel MT, et al. Strategies for applying gray water effluent on ornamental sunflower crops. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(31):38537-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09200-6
  77. 77. Burgos V, Araya F, Reyes-Contreras C, Vera I, Vidal G. Performance of ornamental plants in mesocosm subsurface constructed wetlands under different organic sewage loading. Ecological Engineering. 2017;99:246-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.058
  78. 78. Rucandio MI, Petit-Domínguez MD, Fidalgo-Hijano C, García-Giménez R. Biomonitoring of chemical elements in an urban environment using arboreal and bush plant species. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2011;18:51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0350-y
  79. 79. Soumya Chatterjee SC, Mridul Chetia MC, Lokendra Singh LS, Buddhadeb Chattopadhyay BC, Siddhartha Datta SD, Mukhopadhyay S. A study on the phytoaccumulation of waste elements in wetland plants of a Ramsar site in India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2011;178:361-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1695-x
  80. 80. Willey N. Phytoremediation: methods and reviews: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
  81. 81. Beyersmann D, Hartwig A. Carcinogenic metal compounds: recent insight into molecular and cellular mechanisms. Archives of Toxicology. 2008;82:493-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0313-y
  82. 82. Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ. Accumulation of Pb, Cu and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Science of the Total Environment. 2006;368(2-3):456-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.016
  83. 83. Zhu H, Chen L, Xing W, Ran S, Wei Z, Amee M, et al. Phytohormones-induced senescence efficiently promotes the transport of cadmium from roots into shoots of plants: a novel strategy for strengthening of phytoremediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020;388:122080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122080
  84. 84. Ting W, Tan I, Salleh S, Wahab N. Application of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) for phytoremediation of ammoniacal nitrogen: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2018;22:239-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.02.011
  85. 85. Tan HW, Pang YL, Lim S, Chong WC. A state-of-the-art of phytoremediation approach for sustainable management of heavy metals recovery. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2023;30:103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103043
  86. 86. Li C, Ji X, Luo X. Visualizing hotspots and future trends in phytomining research through scientometrics. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114593
  87. 87. Patil PD, Bhange VP, Shende SS, Ghorpade PS. Greywater characterization of an Indian household and potential treatment for reuse. Water-Energy Nexus. 2022;5:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2021.12.001
  88. 88. Wanjiru E, Xia X. Sustainable energy-water management for residential houses with optimal integrated grey and rain water recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;170:1151-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.212
  89. 89. Asano T, Maeda M, Takaki M. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Japan: overview and implementation examples. Water Science and Technology. 1996;34(11):219-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00841-4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.