Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Efficacy of integrated weed management (IWM) practices on the weed dynamics, production and productivity of direct-seeded rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8224
Submitted
13 March 2025
Published
18-05-2025 — Updated on 27-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study assessed the efficacy of Integrated Weed Management (IWM) practices on weed dynamics, crop resistance, weed persistence and the production and productivity of direct-seeded rice during the Kharif seasons of 2021 and 2022 at the Agronomical Research Farm, BAU, Ranchi, on sandy loam soil. Twelve IWM treatments, incorporating varying herbicidal doses and inter-culture practices, were evaluated. The weed composition was predominantly grassy (37.59 %), sedge (41.24 %) and broad-leaved (21.16 %) species. The highest weed density and dry weight at 60 days after sowing (DAS) were recorded in the weedy check. Weed Management Efficacy was quantified using indices such as Weed Control Index (WCI), Weed Persistence Index (WPI) and Crop Resistance Index (CRI). The most effective treatments included three hand weedings and the combination of Pretilachlor (1.00 kg a.i./ha, pre-emergence) followed by Bispyribac Sodium (0.025 kg a.i./ha, post-emergence at 20 DAS). Both treatments resulted in significantly higher grain (41.70 q/ha) and straw yield (61.30 q/ha) compared to the weedy check. Economic analysis revealed that Pretilachlor + Bispyribac Sodium provided the highest net return (Rs. 67,064 per ha) and benefit-cost ratio (B: C ratio), followed by three hand weedings (Rs. 58,741 perha). The results indicated that IWM practices, particularly herbicide combinations, significantly improved weed control, crop resistance, yield and economic returns in direct-seeded rice systems.

References

  1. 1. Tyagi R, Chander JK. Comparative analysis between direct-seeded rice and conventional transplanted rice method. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2020;9(6):236-38.
  2. 2. Chauhan BS. Weed management in direct-seededrice systems. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines. 2012; p.20.
  3. 3. Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, Sardana V, Timsina J, Jat ML. Productivity and sustainability of the rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: problems, opportunities, and strategies. Advances in Agronomy. 2012;117:315-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00006-4
  4. 4. Jat RK, Meena VS, Kumar M, Jakkula VS, Reddy IR, Pandey AC. Direct-seeded rice: Strategies to improve crop resilience and food security under adverse climatic conditions. Land. 2022;11(3):382. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030382
  5. 5. Pinjari SS, Gangawane SB, Mhaskar NV, Chavan SA, Chavan VG, Jagtap DN. Integrated use of herbicides to enhance yield and economics of direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2016;48(3):279-83. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00068.X
  6. 6. Chaudhary A, Venkatramanan V, Mishra AK, Sharma S. Agronomic and environmental determinants of direct-seeded rice in South Asia. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2023;3(1):253-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00173-x
  7. 7. Gill GS, Vijaykumar K. Weed index – a new method for reporting weed control trials. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 1966;14:96-8.
  8. 8. Mishra M, Mishra A. Estimation of IPM index in jute: A new approach. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 1997;29(1):39-42.
  9. 9. Krishnamurthy K, Raju BG, Raghunath G, Jagnath MK, Prasad TVR. Herbicide efficiency index in sorghum. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 1975;7(2):75-9.
  10. 10. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons; c1984.
  11. 11. Mukerjee PK, Maithy SK. Weed control in transplanted and wet seeded rainy season rice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011;81(2): 134–39.
  12. 12. Yadav DB, Punia SS, Yadav A. Efficacy of bispyribac-sodium, azimsulfuron and penoxsulam for postemergence weed control in transplanted rice. (In) Proceedings Biennial Conference on Recent Advances in Weed Science Research, held during 25–26 February 2010 at the Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 2010a;75.
  13. 13. Kumar S, Singh RK. Interaction effect of nitrogen schedule and weed management on yield of direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2016:48(4):372–77. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00097.6
  14. 14. Singh A, Singh Y, Singh R, Jat AL. Weed dynamics and production potential of direct-seeded rice cultivars as influenced by weed management. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(2):108–12. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00030.2
  15. 15. Hossain MA, Moi S, Mandal B, Sardar S, Seal D, Patra BC. Efficacy assessment of Bispyribac Sodium 9.5 % + Penoxsulam 7.8 % SC for weed management in winter rice. Journal of Crop and Weed. 2024;20(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2024.v20.i1.1757
  16. 16. Kumar S, Rana SS, Chander N, Ramesh. Mixed weed flora management by bispyribac-sodium in transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2013;45(3):151-55.
  17. 17. Rawat A, Chaudhary CS, Upadhyay B, Jain V. Efficacy of bispyribac sodium on weed flora and yield of drilled rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2012;44(3):183-85.
  18. 18. Walia US, Walia SS, Amandeep SS, Shelly N. Bio-efficacy of pre-and post-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded rice in Central Punjab. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2012;44(1):30-3.
  19. 19. Yadav DB, Yadav A, Punia SS. Evaluation of bispyribac-sodium for weed control in transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2009;41(1&2):23-7.
  20. 20. Upasani RR, Kumari P, Thakur R, Singh MK. Effect of seed rate and weed control methods on productivity and profitability of wet land rice under medium land condition. Indian J Weed Sci.2012;44(2):98-100.
  21. 21. Singh NK, Singh UP. Crop establishment methods and weed management on growth and yield of dry direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2014;46(4):308-13.
  22. 22. Poonguzhalan R, Daniel PS, Mohan R, Suburayalu E. Weed management for enhanced production of aerobic rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2012;44(4):270-73.
  23. 23. Prasad TVP, Reddy CV, Bharathalakshmi M, Satyanarayana PV. Efficacy of new herbicide molecules for weed management in wet direct-seeded rice. Oryza. 2016;53(1):98-101.
  24. 24. Reddy TY, Reddy GH. Principles of Agronomy. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India. 2005; p.54-326.
  25. 25. Daniel PSJ, Poonguzhalan R, Mohan R, Suburayalu E. Weed management for enhanced production of aerobic rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2012;22(4):270-73.
  26. 26. Mahajan G, Timsina J. Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control methods on weed abundance and yield of direct-seeded rice. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2011;57:239-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340903369384
  27. 27. Yadav V, Tiwari RK, Tiwari P, Tiwari J. Integrated Weed Management in Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences.2018;7(1): 3099-3104. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.367
  28. 28. Yogananda SB, Thimmegowda P, Shruthi GK. Weed management effect on growth and yield of wet direct-seeded rice in the Cauvery command area of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(3):219-22. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00058.2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.