Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Evaluating the efficacy of nano-NPK liquid fertilizer on rice: Impact on physiology, grain quality and soil microbial communities

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9821
Submitted
4 June 2025
Published
29-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Nano-fertilizers offer a sustainable strategy to improve nutrient-use efficiency while reducing reliance on conventional fertilizers. This study investigates the efficacy of foliar-application of nano-NPK liquid fertilizer in rice. The effects of fertilizers were examined through changes in physiological responses, grain quality and soil microbial communities. A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi 2023-24 and Kharif 2024 seasons with nine treatments in which different concentrations (50, 75 and 100 %) of Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF) were used along with one or two foliar sprays of 1 % nano-NPK at the tillering and panicle initiation stages. Key parameters assessed included chlorophyll content, NDVI, amylose, crude protein content and microbial populations. Results indicated that the application of 100 % RDF, combined with a foliar spray of 1 % nano-NPK at the tillering stage, significantly enhanced physiological traits and grain quality. This performance was statistically comparable to 100 % RDF alone and 75 % RDF with two nano-NPK sprays at tillering and panicle initiation stages. Notably, nano-NPK foliar spray without basal NPK led to substantial increases in soil microbial populations. These findings suggest that reduction (about 25 %) in conventional NPK inputs can be maintained through supplementation of nano-fertilizers. This was evident through rice productivity and improved soil health via enhanced nutrient-use efficiency. The findings suggest that nano-fertilizers can act as a sustainable alternative to conventional fertilizers and help in coping up seasonal variability in rice production.

References

  1. 1. Yomso J, Menon S. Impact of nanofertilizers on growth and yield parameters of rice crop: a review. J Pharm Innov. 2021;10:249-53.
  2. 2. Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014
  3. 3. Bhatt R, Kukal SS, Busari MA, Arora S, Yadav M. Sustainability issues on rice-wheat cropping system. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2016;4(1):64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001
  4. 4. Liu X, Wang H, Zhou J, Hu F, Zhu D, Chen Z, et al. Effect of N fertilization pattern on rice yield, N use efficiency and fertilizer-N fate in the Yangtze River Basin, China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166002
  5. 5. Manikandan A, Subramanian K. Evaluation of zeolite based nitrogen nano-fertilizers on maize growth, yield and quality on inceptisols and alfisols. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2016;9(4):1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2016/22103
  6. 6. Meghana KT, Wahiduzzaman M, Vamsi G. Nanofertilizers in agriculture. Acta Sci Agric. 2021;5(3):35-46. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2021.05.0956
  7. 7. El-Awady RA, Nada A, Elekhtyar NM. Effect of different sources of nitrogen application on rice yield and soil health in saline sodic soil. J Soil Sci Agric Eng. 2022;13(11):371-80. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2022.158996.1102
  8. 8. Ekinci M, Dursun A, Yildirim E, Parlakova F. Effects of nanotechnology liquid fertilizers on the plant growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus. 2014;13(3).
  9. 9. Yadav A, Yadav K, Abd-Elsalam KA. Nanofertilizers: types, delivery and advantages in agricultural sustainability. Agrochemicals. 2023;2(2):296-336. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals2020019
  10. 10. Herrera JM, Rubio G, Häner LL, Delgado JA, Lucho-Constantino CA, Islas-Valdez S, et al. Emerging and established technologies to increase nitrogen use efficiency of cereals. Agronomy. 2016;6(2):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6020025
  11. 11. Okey-Onyesolu CF, Hassanisaadi M, Bilal M, Barani M, Rahdar A, Iqbal J, et al. Nanomaterials as nanofertilizers and nanopesticides: an overview. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(33):8645-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202102379
  12. 12. Yoshida S, Cock J, Parao F. Physiological aspects of high yields; 1972. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.23.060172.002253
  13. 13. Juliano BO. The rice caryopsis and its composition. In: Houston DF, editor. Rice: chemistry and technology. St. Paul (MN): American Association of Cereal Chemists; 1972. p. 16-74
  14. 14. Humphries EC. Mineral components and ash analysis. In: Paech K, Tracey MV, editors. Modern methods of plant analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1956. p. 468-502 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80530-1_17
  15. 15. Sharma SK, Sharma P, Mandeewal RL, Sharma V, Chaudhary R, Pandey R, et al. Effect of foliar application of nano-urea under different nitrogen levels on growth and nutrient content of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(20):149-55. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031138
  16. 16. Padhan BK, Sathee L, Kumar S, Chinnusamy V, Kumar A. Variation in nitrogen partitioning and reproductive stage nitrogen remobilization determines nitrogen grain production efficiency (NUEg) in diverse rice genotypes under varying nitrogen supply. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1093581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1093581
  17. 17. Peng J, Feng Y, Wang X, Li J, Xu G, Phonenasay S, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic pigment, leaf fluorescence characteristics and yield of indica hybrid rice and their interrelations. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86858-z
  18. 18. Gerona MEB, Deocampo MP, Egdane JA, Ismail AM, Dionisio-Sese ML. Physiological responses of contrasting rice genotypes to salt stress at reproductive stage. Rice Sci. 2019;26(4):207-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2019.05.001
  19. 19. Sanjeev K, Parasuraman P, Kannan P, Manivannan V, Senthil A. Insights of nano-NPK foliar application on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science Today. 2024;11:5837. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5837
  20. 20. Duhan B, Singh M. Effect of green manuring and nitrogen on yield of and uptake of micronutrients by rice. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2002;50(2):178-80.
  21. 21. Saud M, Joseph M, Hemalatha M, Rajakumar D, Jothimani S. Effect of bio organic fertilizers (BoF) with nano urea spray on nitrogen economy of rice. Health. 2011;18:15.
  22. 22. Chudasama S, Usadadia V, Kaswala A, Patel K, Chaudhary B, Shiyal V. Influence of liquid nano urea fertilizer on growth and yield of summer rice (Oryza sativa L.) under South Gujarat conditions.
  23. 23. Baghla D, Sharma V. Impact of foliar application of bio nano P and K and their conventional sources on yield of maize and wheat in an acid Alfisol. Himachal J Agric Res. 2023:55-61.
  24. 24. Kumar M, Singh Y, Maurya SK, Maurya SK, Maurya DK, Sachan R, et al. Efficient use of nano-fertilizer for increasing productivity and profitability along with maintain sustainability in rice crop: a review. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13:1358-68. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102788
  25. 25. Raliya R, Tarafdar JC, Biswas P. Enhancing the mobilization of native phosphorus in the mung bean rhizosphere using ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by soil fungi. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(16):3111-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05224
  26. 26. Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci Total Environ. 2015;514:131-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104
  27. 27. Zhao F, Xin X, Cao Y, Su D, Ji P, Zhu Z, et al. Use of carbon nanoparticles to improve soil fertility, crop growth and nutrient uptake by corn (Zea mays L.). Nanomaterials. 2021;11(10):2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102717
  28. 28. Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Adv Agron. 2005;88:97-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88004-6
  29. 29. Burhan M, Al-Hassan S. Impact of nano NPK fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2019;50. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50iSpecial.171
  30. 30. Dimkpa CO, Bindraban PS. Nanofertilizers: new products for the industry? J Agric Food Chem. 2017;66(26):6462-73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02150
  31. 31. Kalwani M, Chakdar H, Srivastava A, Pabbi S, Shukla P. Effects of nanofertilizers on soil and plant-associated microbial communities: emerging trends and perspectives. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132107
  32. 32. Khati P, Sharma A, Gangola S, Kumar R, Bhatt P, Kumar G. Impact of agri-usable nanocompounds on soil microbial activity: an indicator of soil health. Clean Soil Air Water. 2017;45(5):1600458. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201600458
  33. 33. Chinnappa S, Krishnamurthy D, Ajayakumar M, Ramesha Y, Ravi S. Effect of nano fertilizers on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and soil microbiology of Kharif sorghum. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(10):2339-48. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102899

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.